Classic Monticello Daily Planner

I've been using FranklinCovey planners since I started work after college in 1989 and I do find them to be one of the best day-planners on the market. I am, however, disappointed in the quality of my last annual planner refill pages. After 30 years of using Franklin planners, I've become enamored with their planning format. I started with the Classic version for my first job back in 1989, tried the Compact size a few years later and ultimately settled on the Monarch (two-page day size) since the late 1990s and have been purchasing the yearly filler pages since. While I generally keep it simple and order the basic green/white filler pages, I recently ordered one of the more ornate page styles (Monticello) simply because it was only slightly more than the basic pages and looked nice. The pages themselves look good and still have the classic Franklin planner style that I have grown accustomed-to for over 30 years, but I was highly disappointed in the paper quality of the filler pages. More specifically, the paper used for the pages is much thinner than any of my previous filler pages. Now, all my writing slightly bleeds-through and perforates the pages of the next day ... something I've never experienced in any previous yearly refills. I understand that paper conservation/re-cycling is a standard these days, but I shouldn't expect to pay a premium (as annual refills cost about $50) for lower quality. I hope this is not the "new standard" for FranklinCovey.