(NEW) Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" DUHD Curved Gaming Monitor

RE: SAMSUNG 57" Odyssey Neo G9 Series Dual 4K UHD 1000R Curved Gaming Monitor, 240Hz, After a lengthy discussion with Samsung Support, it appears that a maximum refresh rate of 120Hz is the best that can be had at full resolution with the HDMI 2.1 port on an RTX 4090. While there are graphics cards with DP2.1 ports that can run at the higher refresh rate (e.g., RX 7900 XTX), the reality is that they do not provide any where near the graphics performance of the 4090 (i.e. RX 7900 XTX has lower net frame rates in actual game play at max res) so not a solution. Samsung support could not provide a means to use two cables to simulate a two monitor circumstance on a single monitor display using PBP that would match the existing (and limited) single cable performance. In fact, in PBP mode the monitor is overall slower than 120Hz. I currently run my games on a 32" monitor at over 120Hz (many run up to 240Hz) so this monitor is a step down in that regard (at a huge step up in price). At this point, it is better/cheaper to have two monitors. In particular it is cheaper to use two SAMSUNG 32" Odyssey Neo G8 4K UHD 240Hz monitors each with 3840 x 2160 Pixels for a total of 7680 x 2160 Pixels. You can run each of these at up to 240Hz simultaneously on a graphics card such as an RTX 4090. I would rather have a narrow bezel separating two monitors of equivalent resolution than the diminished frame rate on offer here. Consequently unless/until Samsung recognizes the reality of the Graphics landscape and (assuming possible) changes this monitor to operate as two independent bezel-less monitors each on a distinct cable, I can not recommend it. Since I am not willing to give up the higher refresh rate of the 32" monitor, I returned this monitor. EDIT: This monitor also has the persistence problem afflicting many Neo monitors concerning the use of HDMI 2.1. What happens is that the UEFI/BIOS screen will not display if HDMI 2.1 is displayed most cases. Often times when booting with HDMI 2.1 enabled, the OS can bring the display up, but not always. This does not happen with any other monitor. It is not corrected with the the latest firmware updates either. I had to show Samsung support this behavior on a live video stream before the support agents accepted the reality. The only evident work around is to shutdown the PC, then press the OSD joystick so that the OSD menu is displayed on the screen and then power-up/boot the PC. In this circumstance, the UEFI/BIOS screeen will display and the PC will boot with the display operational. To use best use this work-around, it helps to increase the OSD on-time in the OSD menu to the maximum time so that there will be enough time for the PC to boot. I guess that Samsung didn't test for this or chooses to ignore the issue. This is unacceptable behavior for a monitor in this price range.